The risk test
Pipeline risk should be assessed against the actual site catchment, not only the council area or suburb label.
- Is the project inside the 5, 10, or 15 minute drive-time catchment?
- Does the official source publish a proposed place count?
- Is the status lodged, advertised, approved, under construction, completed, withdrawn, or refused?
- Is the source recent enough to rely on for investment screening?
- Would the future places materially change the commercial supply-demand ratio?
Risk levels
A practical pipeline view separates weak signals from decision-grade threats.
- Low risk: distant, stale, refused, withdrawn, or no defensible childcare-place evidence.
- Moderate risk: nearby proposal with unclear timing, incomplete documents, or uncertain place evidence.
- High risk: nearby approved or under-construction centre with a source-backed place count.
- Unknown risk: source coverage is blocked, not audited, or missing key documents.
Why source links matter
Pipeline claims should be traceable to a public register, planning portal, council agenda, decision notice, traffic report, statement of environmental effects, or approved plan. If the source does not support the place count, the report should say so.
How to use it
For acquisitions, pipeline risk informs price, diligence depth, and competitor monitoring. For developers, it helps decide whether the site still has enough future demand after nearby approvals are included.